The Annual School
District Meeting
WHAT A
DIFFERENCE A FEW YEARS MAKE
Mercer could very well
have its own version of the 1950’s popular hit song “What a Difference a Day
Makes” *, and it could be entitled “What a Difference a Few Years Make”.
This was evident at
Monday night’s Annual School District meeting when only 13 people attended, in
stark contrast with the hundreds who would jam the meeting hall just a few
years ago. And it was a tranquil
meeting, compared with the turbulent 2017 meeting when obscenities were shouted
by a school board member and another board member charged, in a threatening
manner, at a senior citizen who was calmly asking the board to address the
problem of the school’s low ACT scores.
There are probably
several reasons for the meager attendance Monday night. The meeting was held “in person” and
people may have stayed away for fear of the rising Covid-19 virus cases in Iron
County, (The meeting was held in the
school’s gymnasium with seating eight feet apart and face masks required.) Or
it could because there was nothing controversial about the budget hearing
portion of the meeting. Then, too,
residents may be pleased with the performance of the “new” school board and
administrator and saw no need to attend.
A 2020-21
budget was presented which will result in a small 1.5% increase in total
expenditures, rising $53,311 from $3,487,802 in 2019-20 to $3,541,113 in
2020-21. A slight decrease in school
taxes will result from an increase in property valuation in the school district
and a slightly lower levy rate. The
budget set the annual tax levy at $2,251,298, dropping the millage rate slightly
to 4.74% from 4.82% last year.
Unlike in
previous years when the annual meeting date was always set for the last Monday
in October, the electors voted to give the board the authority to set next
year’s meeting date at least by the time of the board’s June meeting. Under
state law, the annual meeting must be held before October 31. Some of the data needed by the board to
finalize a budget is normally not available until shortly before that
deadline.
The only issue of concern
at Monday night’s meeting were some items on the Community Services Fund 80
budget. The School Board has budgeted
$157,720 for 2020-21 Fund 80, compared with $120,874 actually spent in
2019-20. The controversial free meals
for the public and payments to Paw Shop
volunteers remain in the new budget, but the administrator and board were asked
to examine DPI rules and state statutes
to determine that the criteria for use is being met.
It was also voted to
increase the board members’ annual salaries from $2,500 to $3,000. A proposal to
reduce it to $2,000 was defeated.
*“What a Difference a Day
Makes”is an English translation of MarĂa Grever’s 1934 Spanish-language song “Cuando vuelva a tu lado”. The English
version was first recorded that same year and has been redone many times since,
though Dinah Washington’s 1959 version is the most famous.
For full coverage of the annual meeting read the Iron County Miner. Editor Ricky Kelly was the only reporter at the meeting and, as she usually does, provides a complete report.
ReplyDeleteThe real story is what is happening to the number of students, how many kids in a class, especially specials, and what are the future projections. 1% increase in budget yet 10% decrease in number of students— all within one year? What are the future projections?
ReplyDeleteI am happy the finances are corrected from the previous School Board. What exactly has THIS School Board and Administrator done differently to improve the quality of education? I would like to see a list of those accomplishments especially if the student class sizes has dropped.
ReplyDeleteMy kids go to this school. I don’t see how any of the kids are benefiting. Still waiting........
ReplyDeleteIt’s encouraging that some parents seem to be commenting about the school’s academics. But where were they when the kids were being deprived of an education under Torkelson and the former corrupt school board?
ReplyDeleteThere were several posts expressing frustration around student achievement prior to the changes. This isn’t new. A lot of us who still have kids at Mercer have been vocal and still no improvements around education. Notice more families are sending their HS kids elsewhere than before. What does that tell u?
DeleteI think I read $25000 to educate a student.. Is this accurate? The funds that are set up that are not for education but which are under the umbrella of the school district (why I will never understand) should not be part of EDUCATIONAL COST PER STUDENT. Seems like the funds ((are they really FUNDS) should be under town govt, not school govt.
ReplyDeleteThe actual cost for operating the school is $3,383,393 divided by 128, the number of students, = $26,433 per student. Total expenditures are budgeted at $3,541,113 minus $157,720, Community Service Fund 80 = $3,383,393. Fund 80 is the only expenditure which is not included as a cost to operate the school. All other projected expenditures – debt service, capital projects, food service –are necessary for operating the school, and, therefore, should be included in the cost per student.
DeleteYou are correct. Those are all expenses for the school necessary to educate each student.
ReplyDeleteSo numbers do not lie. Close this school already.
Do it for the taxpayers, but more importantly do it for the students. They deserve a far better education than they can receive at Mercer School. This will also provide the students more opportunities.
The elimination of Torkelson and some of his cronies has temporarily solved the hemorrhaging of money from the school.
ReplyDeleteHowever the educational curriculum for the students is the responsibility of the district administrator, who should be monitoring it's development and implementation. One of the problems at Mercer School is that they don't have a set curriculum from year to year.
This lack of consistency in curriculum from year to year may account for the poor test scores on state achievement exams.
The curriculum will be unlikely to improve seeing as how the same people are still responsible for it.
ReplyDelete